Different Stories about everyday people that we see. The stories of their life. To see and hear and relate to what is being portrayed. The bare facts and no cut cards or short ends.
The real-life of people in which we don’t see. The life people have and hold on to. The true stories and how they live. The honesty, trust, and disloyalty in people allow trama and chaos. The lives of everyday people from perfect homes to the street bricks. The peers of teens are adults and how to survive a bully in and out of work and school. The survival of the fittest. and The proper way to do it. Also, there will be many action pack stories to keep the audience entertained
Reviews
1Honestly I feel like I've lost brain cells reading the description for this "Network"... This is what happens when you give stupid people a platform. To literally everyone: Please don't start a television network if you can't even write a paragraph better structured than a 3rd grader.
First sentence "Different Stories [why capitalize stories?] about everyday people that we see."
Second sentence: "The stories [not capitalized here] of their life. [Who's life? So everyone shares 1 life? Or is this a weird pronoun thing and 'their' is just gender neutral for he or she? If so, who is this mystery person?]
Third sentence: "To see and hear and relate [list? use commas...] to what is being portrayed." [What is being portrayed? And by whom? What are we talking about?]
Fourth sentence: "The bare facts and no cut cards or short ends." [This contradicts itself. You can't have bare facts AND no short ends. Bare facts = simple bare bones facts without a bunch of detail and embellishment. No short ends = rejecting anything that's not thorough or overly complete, basically substandard is incomplete. AKA bare facts would be considered short ends because they are exactly that... Bare.]
Fifth sentence (the real reason I started analyzing these ridiculous sentences): "The real-life of people in which we don't see." [See first sentence] (So, do we see or not?) Also, just... WHAT? 'in which we don't see... In.... Which.... we don't see.... HUH?! Also, 'The real-life of people...'... The real-life (What is a real-life) of people? Is this a 3rd grade reading level's attempt at saying "The unseen lives of real people?"
Imagine putting the first and second sentence together, and then the fifth, sixth, and seventh sentence together, but with some knowledge of how English works...
1+2 = "Various life stories of people we see every day.
5+6+7 = "True stories about the lives of people we've [probably] never seen before"
I have to touch on the remaining sentences as well, as they are just as bad or worse.
"The honesty, trust, and disloyalty in people allow trama and chaos.".... HAHAHAHA what? So, according to this scholar, the honesty and trust in people -- as well as their very closely related cousin/wife 'disloyalty' -- allow trama and chaos to... wait.. oh, it looks as if they never finished their thought. The sentence seems to abruptly end before the thought is concluded. In addition to what I assume is a 4th graders attempt at spelling 'trauma'...
I guess we'll never know what "honesty, trust, and disloyalty in people, allows 'trama' and chaos to really do, or not do... That is unfortunate to say the least.
Next we have: "The lives of everyday people from perfect homes to the street bricks." uh... What is a perfect home to the street brick? The lives of everyday people from perfect homes... Go(?)... to the street bricks? In fact, what are street bricks? Is this entirely a reference to colonial or Victorian times? Times in which streets were made of bricks? I still don't understand, it seems the sentence structure of this jumble of words just does not exist prominently enough to make any sense of it.
Next?: "The peers of teens are adults and how to survive a bully in and out of work and school." I.. eh... Did the person writing the description of this television network have a stroke in the middle of writing? I mean, this doesn't even begin to make even the slightest sense. This is worse than the worst Ai hallucinations. This is like, "I started writing this with a 4th grade education, but I finished writing this with a gold fish level IQ"... I'm concerned that someone somewhere has fallen out of their desk chair, and this is their final plea for assistance... or at least for a mercy killing.
The next line... "The survival of the fittest." What is the survival of the fittest? Are you ok? Did you develop turrets now as well?
Next line: "and The proper way to do it." ....... <.<.....yeah.. does anyone see an African around somewhere? Thats probably this persons caretaker... We should tell them that their person is glitching out, defecating themselves, and probably experiencing a great deal of "trama".
I'm done. Nope not even gonna touch that last sentence. Thats where this goes from being funny, to me catching a charge. So... hope everyone had a good time reading this at this networks expense. Peace.